Skip to content
GitLab
Projects Groups Snippets
  • /
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
    • Contribute to GitLab
  • Sign in / Register
  • dynare dynare
  • Project information
    • Project information
    • Activity
    • Labels
    • Members
  • Repository
    • Repository
    • Files
    • Commits
    • Branches
    • Tags
    • Contributors
    • Graph
    • Compare
  • Issues 118
    • Issues 118
    • List
    • Boards
    • Service Desk
    • Milestones
  • Merge requests 4
    • Merge requests 4
  • CI/CD
    • CI/CD
    • Pipelines
    • Jobs
    • Schedules
  • Deployments
    • Deployments
    • Environments
    • Releases
  • Packages and registries
    • Packages and registries
    • Container Registry
  • Monitor
    • Monitor
    • Incidents
  • Analytics
    • Analytics
    • Value stream
    • CI/CD
    • Repository
  • Wiki
    • Wiki
  • Snippets
    • Snippets
  • Activity
  • Graph
  • Create a new issue
  • Jobs
  • Commits
  • Issue Boards
Collapse sidebar
  • DynareDynare
  • dynaredynare
  • Issues
  • #1610
Closed
Open
Issue created May 25, 2018 by Johannes Pfeifer@JohannesPfeiferDeveloper

Make estimated_params_init robust to wrongly specified parameters

The file

/*
 * This file replicates the estimation of the cash in advance model (termed M1 
 * in the paper) described in Frank Schorfheide (2000): "Loss function-based 
 * evaluation of DSGE models", Journal of Applied Econometrics, 15(6), 645-670.
 *
 * The data are in file "fsdat_simul.m", and have been artificially generated.
 * They are therefore different from the original dataset used by Schorfheide.
 *
 * The prior distribution follows the one originally specified in Schorfheide's
 * paper, except for parameter rho. In the paper, the elicited beta prior for rho
 * implies an asymptote and corresponding prior mode at 0. It is generally
 * recommended to avoid this extreme type of prior. Some optimizers, for instance
 * mode_compute=12 (Mathworks' particleswarm algorithm) may find a posterior mode
 * with rho equal to zero. We lowered the value of the prior standard deviation
 * (changing .223 to .100) to remove the asymptote.
 *
 * The equations are taken from J. Nason and T. Cogley (1994): "Testing the
 * implications of long-run neutrality for monetary business cycle models",
 * Journal of Applied Econometrics, 9, S37-S70.
 * Note that there is an initial minus sign missing in equation (A1), p. S63.
 *
 * This implementation was originally written by Michel Juillard. Please note that the
 * following copyright notice only applies to this Dynare implementation of the
 * model.
 */

/*
 * Copyright (C) 2004-2017 Dynare Team
 *
 * This file is part of Dynare.
 *
 * Dynare is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
 * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
 * the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or
 * (at your option) any later version.
 *
 * Dynare is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
 * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
 * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
 * GNU General Public License for more details.
 *
 * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
 * along with Dynare.  If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
 */

var m P c e W R k d n l gy_obs gp_obs y dA;
varexo e_a e_m;

parameters alp bet gam mst rho psi del;

alp = 0.33;
bet = 0.99;
gam = 0.003;
mst = 1.011;
rho = 0.7;
psi = 0.787;
del = 0.02;

model;
dA = exp(gam+e_a);
log(m) = (1-rho)*log(mst) + rho*log(m(-1))+e_m;
-P/(c(+1)*P(+1)*m)+bet*P(+1)*(alp*exp(-alp*(gam+log(e(+1))))*k^(alp-1)*n(+1)^(1-alp)+(1-del)*exp(-(gam+log(e(+1)))))/(c(+2)*P(+2)*m(+1))=0;
W = l/n;
-(psi/(1-psi))*(c*P/(1-n))+l/n = 0;
R = P*(1-alp)*exp(-alp*(gam+e_a))*k(-1)^alp*n^(-alp)/W;
1/(c*P)-bet*P*(1-alp)*exp(-alp*(gam+e_a))*k(-1)^alp*n^(1-alp)/(m*l*c(+1)*P(+1)) = 0;
c+k = exp(-alp*(gam+e_a))*k(-1)^alp*n^(1-alp)+(1-del)*exp(-(gam+e_a))*k(-1);
P*c = m;
m-1+d = l;
e = exp(e_a);
y = k(-1)^alp*n^(1-alp)*exp(-alp*(gam+e_a));
gy_obs = dA*y/y(-1);
gp_obs = (P/P(-1))*m(-1)/dA;
end;

shocks;
var e_a; stderr 0.014;
var e_m; stderr 0.005;
end;

steady_state_model;
  dA = exp(gam);
  gst = 1/dA;
  m = mst;
  khst = ( (1-gst*bet*(1-del)) / (alp*gst^alp*bet) )^(1/(alp-1));
  xist = ( ((khst*gst)^alp - (1-gst*(1-del))*khst)/mst )^(-1);
  nust = psi*mst^2/( (1-alp)*(1-psi)*bet*gst^alp*khst^alp );
  n  = xist/(nust+xist);
  P  = xist + nust;
  k  = khst*n;

  l  = psi*mst*n/( (1-psi)*(1-n) );
  c  = mst/P;
  d  = l - mst + 1;
  y  = k^alp*n^(1-alp)*gst^alp;
  R  = mst/bet;
  W  = l/n;
  ist  = y-c;
  q  = 1 - d;

  e = 1;
  
  gp_obs = m/dA;
  gy_obs = dA;
end;

steady;

check;

estimated_params;
alp, beta_pdf, 0.356, 0.02;
bet, beta_pdf, 0.993, 0.002;
gam, normal_pdf, 0.0085, 0.003;
mst, normal_pdf, 1.0002, 0.007;
rho, beta_pdf, 0.129, 0.100;
psi, beta_pdf, 0.65, 0.05;
% del, beta_pdf, 0.01, 0.005;
% stderr e_a, inv_gamma_pdf, 0.035449, inf;
stderr e_m, inv_gamma_pdf, 0.008862, inf;
end;

estimated_params_init;
del,0.02;
stderr e_a, 0.01;
corr e_a,e_m, 0.5;
end;
varobs gp_obs gy_obs;

estimation(order=1, datafile=fsdat_simul, nobs=192, loglinear, mh_replic=2000, mh_nblocks=2, mh_jscale=0.8);

crashes with a cryptic message, because a correlation is initialized that is not estimated. For structural parameters, there is no error. We should make the behavior informative and consistent

Assignee
Assign to
Time tracking