@@ -22,6 +22,8 @@ We should have a similar syntax for providing information about future values of
We can simply authorize `var` to design an exogenous OR AN ENDOGENOUS variable (maybe a bit confusing) or we can have separate blocks for exogenous variables (shocks) and another block name for future value of endogenous variables (may be too much writing)
JP (2025/10/07): The `perfect_foresight_controlled_paths` provides the necessary syntax. We should mirror it for the stochastic case.
#### Stochastic simulations
This scenario description could be embedded in stochastic simulations like extended path, repeating the simulation while drawing random values for the shocks not constrained by a piece of future information.
