@@ -22,6 +22,8 @@ We should have a similar syntax for providing information about future values of
...
@@ -22,6 +22,8 @@ We should have a similar syntax for providing information about future values of
We can simply authorize `var` to design an exogenous OR AN ENDOGENOUS variable (maybe a bit confusing) or we can have separate blocks for exogenous variables (shocks) and another block name for future value of endogenous variables (may be too much writing)
We can simply authorize `var` to design an exogenous OR AN ENDOGENOUS variable (maybe a bit confusing) or we can have separate blocks for exogenous variables (shocks) and another block name for future value of endogenous variables (may be too much writing)
JP (2025/10/07): The `perfect_foresight_controlled_paths` provides the necessary syntax. We should mirror it for the stochastic case.
#### Stochastic simulations
#### Stochastic simulations
This scenario description could be embedded in stochastic simulations like extended path, repeating the simulation while drawing random values for the shocks not constrained by a piece of future information.
This scenario description could be embedded in stochastic simulations like extended path, repeating the simulation while drawing random values for the shocks not constrained by a piece of future information.
