Skip to content
GitLab
Explore
Sign in
Register
Primary navigation
Search or go to…
Project
D
dynare
Manage
Activity
Members
Labels
Plan
Issues
Issue boards
Milestones
Wiki
Code
Merge requests
Repository
Branches
Commits
Tags
Repository graph
Compare revisions
Snippets
Build
Pipelines
Jobs
Pipeline schedules
Artifacts
Deploy
Releases
Container registry
Model registry
Operate
Environments
Monitor
Incidents
Analyze
Value stream analytics
Contributor analytics
CI/CD analytics
Repository analytics
Model experiments
Help
Help
Support
GitLab documentation
Compare GitLab plans
Community forum
Contribute to GitLab
Provide feedback
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Snippets
Groups
Projects
Show more breadcrumbs
Marco Ratto
dynare
Commits
90cf3614
Commit
90cf3614
authored
4 years ago
by
Marco Ratto
Browse files
Options
Downloads
Patches
Plain Diff
new unit XFAIL test, for situation where scale and value are set in same period for same shock
parent
44e08ab2
Branches
exceptions
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
Pipeline
#5302
passed
4 years ago
Stage: build
Stage: test
Stage: pkg
Changes
1
Pipelines
1
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
tests/estimation/heteroskedastic_shocks/fs2000_het_XFAIL2.mod
+95
-0
95 additions, 0 deletions
...s/estimation/heteroskedastic_shocks/fs2000_het_XFAIL2.mod
with
95 additions
and
0 deletions
tests/estimation/heteroskedastic_shocks/fs2000_het_XFAIL2.mod
0 → 100644
+
95
−
0
View file @
90cf3614
// See fs2000.mod in the examples/ directory for details on the model
var m P c e W R k d n l gy_obs gp_obs y dA;
varexo e_a e_m e_b;
parameters alp bet gam mst rho psi del;
alp = 0.33;
bet = 0.99;
gam = 0.003;
mst = 1.011;
rho = 0.7;
psi = 0.787;
del = 0.02;
model;
dA = exp(gam+e_a);
log(m) = (1-rho)*log(mst) + rho*log(m(-1))+e_m;
-P/(c(+1)*P(+1)*m)+bet*exp(e_b)*P(+1)*(alp*exp(-alp*(gam+log(e(+1))))*k^(alp-1)*n(+1)^(1-alp)+(1-del)*exp(-(gam+log(e(+1)))))/(c(+2)*P(+2)*m(+1))=0;
W = l/n;
-(psi/(1-psi))*(c*P/(1-n))+l/n = 0;
R = P*(1-alp)*exp(-alp*(gam+e_a))*k(-1)^alp*n^(-alp)/W;
1/(c*P)-bet*exp(e_b)*P*(1-alp)*exp(-alp*(gam+e_a))*k(-1)^alp*n^(1-alp)/(m*l*c(+1)*P(+1)) = 0;
c+k = exp(-alp*(gam+e_a))*k(-1)^alp*n^(1-alp)+(1-del)*exp(-(gam+e_a))*k(-1);
P*c = m;
m-1+d = l;
e = exp(e_a);
y = k(-1)^alp*n^(1-alp)*exp(-alp*(gam+e_a));
gy_obs = dA*y/y(-1);
gp_obs = (P/P(-1))*m(-1)/dA;
end;
steady_state_model;
dA = exp(gam);
gst = 1/dA;
m = mst;
khst = ( (1-gst*bet*(1-del)) / (alp*gst^alp*bet) )^(1/(alp-1));
xist = ( ((khst*gst)^alp - (1-gst*(1-del))*khst)/mst )^(-1);
nust = psi*mst^2/( (1-alp)*(1-psi)*bet*gst^alp*khst^alp );
n = xist/(nust+xist);
P = xist + nust;
k = khst*n;
l = psi*mst*n/( (1-psi)*(1-n) );
c = mst/P;
d = l - mst + 1;
y = k^alp*n^(1-alp)*gst^alp;
R = mst/bet;
W = l/n;
ist = y-c;
q = 1 - d;
e = 1;
gp_obs = m/dA;
gy_obs = dA;
end;
shocks;
var e_a; stderr 0.014;
var e_m; stderr 0.005;
end;
steady;
check;
estimated_params;
alp, beta_pdf, 0.356, 0.02;
bet, beta_pdf, 0.993, 0.002;
gam, normal_pdf, 0.0085, 0.003;
mst, normal_pdf, 1.0002, 0.007;
rho, beta_pdf, 0.129, 0.223;
psi, beta_pdf, 0.65, 0.05;
del, beta_pdf, 0.01, 0.005;
stderr e_a, inv_gamma_pdf, 0.035449, inf;
stderr e_m, inv_gamma_pdf, 0.008862, inf;
end;
varobs gp_obs gy_obs;
options_.solve_tolf = 1e-12;
M_.heteroskedastic_shocks.Qhet.e_b.time_value = 100:120;
M_.heteroskedastic_shocks.Qhet.e_b.value = 0.01;
M_.heteroskedastic_shocks.Qhet.e_a.time_scale = 100:120;
M_.heteroskedastic_shocks.Qhet.e_a.scale = 0;
// here I wrongly set scale on top of value for the same shock and period
M_.heteroskedastic_shocks.Qhet.e_a.time_value = 110;
M_.heteroskedastic_shocks.Qhet.e_a.value = 0.01;
options_.heteroskedastic_filter=true;
estimation(order=1,datafile='../fsdat_simul',nobs=192,loglinear,mh_replic=0,smoother,filtered_vars,forecast=8,filter_step_ahead=[1:8]);
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
Preview
0%
Loading
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Save comment
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment